VALIDATION OF ENERGY SIMULATION MODELS THROUGH COMPARISON WITH ACTUAL ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN BUILDINGS
DOI: xxxx
Accepted: 22/01/2026
Published: 25/01/2026

Abstract

This paper examines the application of computer-based energy modeling and simulation tools in the analysis of building energy performance. The research is based on a comparative case study of two buildings, where detailed 3D models and energy simulations were developed using real data on construction systems, materials, heating, cooling and ventilation systems, as well as local climatic conditions.

The simulation results were compared with the actual energy consumption data for thermal and electrical energy on both monthly and annual levels. The analysis indicates a high level of agreement between simulated and measured values (over 90%), confirming the accuracy and reliability of the applied methodology. In addition to energy consumption, the simulations provide detailed insight into the thermal behavior of the buildings, including heat losses and gains, envelope performance, and CO₂ emissions.

The findings demonstrate that energy simulation tools represent an effective approach for analyzing, evaluating, and improving building energy performance, with significant potential for application in both research and engineering practice.

Authors

  • Liljana Dimevska Sofronievska, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje , Faculty of Architecture , ORCID: 0009-0000-4585-6951
  • Dobre Nikolovski, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje , Faculty of Architecture
  • Bojan Karanakov, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje , Faculty of Architecture , ORCID: 0000-0003-3026-6769

Keywords

  • energy simulation
  • building energy performance analysis
  • 3D modeling
  • energy consumption

References

  • [1] Azhar, S. (2011) Building Information Modelling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), July 2011.
  • [2] Corrado, V., & Fabrizio, E. (2019) Steady-State and Dynamic Codes: Critical Review, Advantages and Disadvantages, Accuracy, and Reliability. In: Handbook of Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 2019
  • [3] Hossain, Md. F. (2019). Sustainable Design and Build: Building, Energy, Roads, Bridges, Water and Sewer Systems. Advanced Building Design, pp. 137–230
  • [4] U.S. Department of Energy (2022) EnergyPlus™ Version 22.2.0 Documentation: Getting Started. September 28, 2022
  • [5] Gasparella, A., & Pernigotto, G. (2012) Extensive Comparative Analysis of Two Building Energy Simulation Codes for Southern Europe Climates: Heating and Cooling Energy Needs and Peak Loads Calculation in TRNSYS and EnergyPlus. II International High Performance Buildings Conference, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
  • [6] Rallapalli, S. H. (2010) A Comparison of EnergyPlus and eQUEST Whole Building Energy Simulation Results for a Medium Sized Office Building. Master of Science Thesis
  • [7] Dandan, Z., et al. (2013) A Detailed Loads Comparison of Three Building Energy Modelling Programs: EnergyPlus, DeST and DOE-2.1E. Building Simulation, 6(3), pp. 324–335
  • [8] Sousa, J. R. B. (2012) Energy Simulation Software for Buildings: Review and Comparison. Engineering, Computer Science. Available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7593404
  • [9] DesignBuilder. (2023) DesignBuilder Dynamic Simulation Model User Manual (DSM v7.2.0)