NUMERICAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF THE MAIN GIRDER OF A DOUBLE-GIRDER BRIDGE CRANE
DOI: xxxxxxxxx
Accepted: 22/01/2026
Published: 26/01/2026

Abstract

In this paper a numerical analysis of a double-girder bridge crane was carried out in order to evaluate the seismic response of the main girder. The analysis includes static, modal and transient FEM analyses in Ansys, with the aim of obtaining a realistic picture of the structural behavior under earthquake excitation. Through the static analysis, the reference values for stresses and deformations under working conditions were obtained, while the modal analysis identified the natural frequencies and the dominant vibration modes. The transient analysis, performed with the real earthquake record El Centro, provides the time histories of displacements, accelerations and stresses at characteristic points along the span. The results showed that the seismic excitation causes increased and time-variable responses compared to the static values, but the structure remained in the elastic domain. The applied approach enables a more detailed representation of the dynamic effects on the girder and serves as a basis for more detailed inspection control of bridge cranes.

Authors

  • Anita Vasileva Ljubotenska, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje , Faculty of Mechanical engineering - Skopje , ORCID: 0000-0002-0755-4773
  • Kristina Jakimovska, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Mechanical engineering - Skopje , ORCID: 0000-0002-5629-359X
  • Aleksandra Bogdanovic, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology , ORCID: 0000-0001-6710-3248
  • Kemal Edip, Affiliation: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology , ORCID: 0000-0002-4542-8911

Keywords

  • bridge crane
  • main girder
  • modal analysis
  • transient analysis
  • ANSYS

References

  • [1] Ministry of Labour and Social Policy of the Republic of North Macedonia. (1982). Rulebook on the Use of Cranes and Industrial Transporters (Official Gazette of RM No. 10/82; amendment No. 17/91)
  • [2] Ministry of Economy of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2006). Law on Technical Requirements for Products and Conformity Assessment (Official Gazette of RM No. 33/06; amendments No. 63/07, 20/09, 26/12, 23/13, 44/15, 120/18)
  • [3] Ostrić, D. (2009) Dizalice, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Mašinski fakultet.
  • [4] Јакимовска, К. (2021). Машини за цикличен транспорт, Универзитет,,Св. Кирил и Методиј” во Скопје, Машински факултет-Скопје.
  • [5] Институт за стандардизација на Република Македонија. (2015). МКС EN 13001-1: Кранови — Општ дизајн — Дел 1: Општи принципи. ИСРМ
  • [6] Hoffmann, K., Krenn, E., & Stanker, G. (2004). Fördertechnik: Maschinensätze, Fördermittel, Tragkonstruktionen, Logistik (5th ed., Vol. 2). Oldenbourg.
  • [7] Hoffmann, K., Krenn, E., & Stanker, G. (2012). Fördertechnik 1: Bauelemente, Konstruktion, Berechnung. Vulkan-Verlag GmbH.
  • [8] Seeßelberg, C. (2016). Kranbahnen: Bemessung und konstruktive Gestaltung nach Eurocode (5th ed.). DIN Media.
  • [9] Drogreshka, K., & Najdovska, J. (2021, January). Seismicity in the republic of north macedonia during the period 2010-2020. In Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the Macedonian Geologists (No. INIS-MK--210001, pp. 65-71).
  • [10] Drogreshka, K., Najdovska, J., Delipetrev, M., & Delipetrev, M. R. (2024, May). High Seismic Activity of Republic of North Macedonia in the Period 2015–2020. In 12th Congress of the Balkan Geophysical Society (Vol. 2024, No. 1, pp. 1-5). European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers.
  • [11] Tretyak, K. R., & Brusak, І. (2020). The research of interrelation between seismic activity and modern horizontal movements of the Carpathian-Balkan region based on the data from permanent GNSS stations. Geodynamics, 1, 28.
  • [12] Baskakova, G. V., Vasilyeva, N. A., Nikishin, A. M., Doronina, M. S., & Ihsanov, B. I. (2022). Identification of the main tectonic events by using 2D–3D seismic data in the eastern Black Sea. Moscow University Geology Bulletin, 77(5), 466-478.
  • [13] Rodríguez, J., Reboul, J., González, P., Crespo, M., Borgerhoff, M., & Schneeberger, C. (2022). Modelling of an Overhead Crane under Seismic Excitations (SOCRAT).
  • [14] Potîrniche, A., & Căpățână, G. (2023). Aspects regarding static stability and dynamic stability of the tower cranes. Int. J. Mod. Manuf. Technol, 15(2).
  • [15] Pourzeynali, S., & Hosseinnezhad, A. (2009). Reliability analysis of bridge structures for earthquake excitations.
  • [16] Otani, A., Nagashima, K., & Suzuki, J. (2002). Vertical seismic response of overhead crane. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 212(1-3), 211-220.
  • [17] Belleri, A., Labò, S., Marini, A., & Riva, P. (2017). The influence of overhead cranes in the seismic performance of industrial buildings. Frontiers in Built Environment, 3, 64.
  • [18] Lisperguier, N., López, Á., & Vielma, J. C. (2023). Seismic performance assessment of a moment-resisting frame steel warehouse provided with overhead crane. Materials, 16(7), 2815.
  • [19] Albar, Y., & Onur, Y. A. (2023). ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION AND OPTIMUM DESIGN OF A DOUBLE GIRDER OVERHEAD CRANE. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (JMET), 15(2), 53-65.
  • [20] Singh, A. (2022). Analysis of the Crane Girder.
  • [21] Meng, Z., Yifei, T., & Xiangdong, L. I. (2018). Finite element analysis of bridge crane metal structure based on ABAQUS. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 198, p. 01004). EDP Sciences.
  • [22] Molnár, D., Blatnický, M., & Dižo, J. (2022). Comparison of analytical and numerical approach in bridge crane solution. Manuf. Technol. 22 (2)(2022).
  • [23] Lee, H.-H. (2021). Finite element simulations with ANSYS Workbench 2021: Theory, applications, case studies. SDC Publications.
  • [24] Kochmann, D. M. (2025). Introduction to finite element analysis. ETH Zurich.
  • [25] Udwadia, F. E., & Trifunac, M. D. (1973). Comparison of earthquake and microtremor ground motions in El Centro, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 63(4), 1227-1253.